Bank Of Canada’s Stephen Poloz Suggests Buying A Smaller Home, After Hiking Interest Rates

The governor of the Bank of Canada, Stephen Poloz, had some advice this week for Canadians facing higher housing costs thanks to the Bank’s interest rate hike: Just buy a smaller house.

“People who don’t qualify for a mortgage on the house they wish today have multiple avenues of adjustment,” Poloz said during a press conferenceannouncing the rate hike, “one of them being to just go ahead to buy a smaller or less expensive home.”

One (perhaps cynical) way to view his comments is: You’re on your own. The Bank of Canada isn’t going to stop hiking rates to save you money on your mortgage payments.

But while Poloz’s comments may come off as insensitive — especially to would-be homebuyers who watched affordability deteriorate as the Bank tripled its key lending rate over the past year, to 1.5 per cent from 0.5 per cent — there may some wisdom in what he says.

Because we Canadians sure occupy a lot of space. According to a PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report from 2017, Canadians own, on average, the third-largest homes in the world, behind only Australians and Americans. At nearly 2,000 square feet, our homes are more than twice as large as homes in Britain, despite the fact that our families are no larger than theirs.

It’s estimated that the average home size in Canada doubled from the 1970s to 2000, though that trend has levelled off, largely thanks to high land costs in Toronto and Vancouver, which have pushed developers to build smaller homes (as have land use regulations requiring more dense neighbourhoods).

Excessively large homes are a liability, economically and to the environment. Heating a 2,000-square-foot home in winter, then air conditioning it in summer, makes for very high energy use and a large carbon footprint.

And the explosion of sprawling suburban neighbourhoods has eaten up much of the accessible land around our city centres. Developers today, especially in Toronto and Vancouver, say one reason house prices are so high is that land supply is so low. In retrospect, it may not have been such a good idea to surround our cities with low-density, low-population neighbourhoods.

Prev1 of 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *